It's because in absolute numbers you have more available every month. But of course, it's not as straight forward because the average gets skewed by a few months where you got 50% return.
You have three months where you got crazy returns, August 2016, December 2016 and July 2017.
Without those three your yearly return drops to 109% (15 months - 3 gives exactly twelve incl. August). You would "only" have 65,287.29. However, you would still have half a million by August 2019 if you didn't withdraw. I shouldn't just remove those three months though. Instead I should mmake them more in line with the other results which are around 20-30%. You also had very low return the first two months so if we even those out as well, we can expect something like the ~180% after one year so about 9% per month on average.
I think that is a better representation of the possible lowest and highest results and which are in line with the result that is being advertised (~180%). If we take the more realistic number of 109% I would have just shy of 100K, 91,487.64 to be exact, by end of 2019.
If we take the 180% number that is mentioned on the Simpletrader signal information tab, I will have 612,607.41 after three years. It's probably going to be somewhere in the middle of the earlier mentioned low and high number.
I think a safe assumption for 4K after three years (so my situation) AND if the EA keeps performing for so "long" is something like 352,047.52 in my currency (EUR).
IF that isn't a holy grail I don't what is. As such, the question becomes, is it possible? Will it fail? Most likely given past results of thousands of other EA's but why? Is it possible to keep evolving and make it so that we can keep the 9% per month?
You have three months where you got crazy returns, August 2016, December 2016 and July 2017.
Without those three your yearly return drops to 109% (15 months - 3 gives exactly twelve incl. August). You would "only" have 65,287.29. However, you would still have half a million by August 2019 if you didn't withdraw. I shouldn't just remove those three months though. Instead I should mmake them more in line with the other results which are around 20-30%. You also had very low return the first two months so if we even those out as well, we can expect something like the ~180% after one year so about 9% per month on average.
I think that is a better representation of the possible lowest and highest results and which are in line with the result that is being advertised (~180%). If we take the more realistic number of 109% I would have just shy of 100K, 91,487.64 to be exact, by end of 2019.
If we take the 180% number that is mentioned on the Simpletrader signal information tab, I will have 612,607.41 after three years. It's probably going to be somewhere in the middle of the earlier mentioned low and high number.
I think a safe assumption for 4K after three years (so my situation) AND if the EA keeps performing for so "long" is something like 352,047.52 in my currency (EUR).
IF that isn't a holy grail I don't what is. As such, the question becomes, is it possible? Will it fail? Most likely given past results of thousands of other EA's but why? Is it possible to keep evolving and make it so that we can keep the 9% per month?
Comment