Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AI4Forex EA - Free to download and test - EA attached

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IA4Forex
    replied
    Originally posted by Amadorian View Post
    Does it help if i use more emoticons?

    Don't be so sensitive. Just because i don't add a smiley or a "i don't want to offend you though" on the end of every sentence, doesn't mean that i have a problem with you.
    With all the garbage EAs posted on forex forums, you just have to look at every detail.
    Ok, fine! My misunderstanding.

    Leave a comment:


  • Amadorian
    replied
    Does it help if i use more emoticons?

    Don't be so sensitive. Just because i don't add a smiley or a "i don't want to offend you though" on the end of every sentence, doesn't mean that i have a problem with you.
    With all the garbage EAs posted on forex forums, you just have to look at every detail.

    Leave a comment:


  • IA4Forex
    replied
    Originally posted by Amadorian View Post
    Now we can see a problem, the margin level on this backtest went down to only 83%. That is extremely close to a margin call on some brokers. (e.g. VantageFX) and many other brokers require a 100% margn.
    Sure, boosted means that! Pushed to the limit of money management.
    Unfortunately backtest is very slow cause of the machine learning process, but I'm doing other backtest with less risk. I'll post them here as soon as I will have finished, or someone could do also backtest alone and publish here results and settings.
    What I cannot understand is why your tone is so hard. Do you have some problem with me?
    I'm not selling anything, the expert is free and attached here. I need critics and ideas for tuning my systems, but your tone is very annoying. I spent undreds of hours to code and tune, please, respect my work and of course write any constructive critics.

    Leave a comment:


  • Amadorian
    replied
    Now we can see a problem, the margin level on this backtest went down to only 83%. That is extremely close to a margin call on some brokers. (e.g. VantageFX) and many other brokers require a 100% margn.
    Last edited by Amadorian; 03-13-2018, 02:38 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • IA4Forex
    replied
    This is the backtest of a boosted version from 2013 to 2018.
    Modeling quality is 100%, using real tick data.
    1370% with max DD=28%
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • IA4Forex
    replied
    Originally posted by Amadorian View Post
    As long as your modeling quality is below 99%, there is something to improve. Do the backtest with tickstory and MT4, i would be very surprised if the results are even close to what you get now.
    After all it will safe you money doint it the right way.
    I give up!

    Leave a comment:


  • Amadorian
    replied
    As long as your modeling quality is below 99%, there is something to improve. Do the backtest with tickstory and MT4, i would be very surprised if the results are even close to what you get now.
    After all it will safe you money doint it the right way.

    Leave a comment:


  • IA4Forex
    replied
    Originally posted by Amadorian View Post
    Use tickstory for a 99% modeling quality backtest. 25% is pretty much worthless.
    MT5 stats has be done with "Real tick". There is nothing better that this. https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/2612

    Leave a comment:


  • Amadorian
    replied
    Use tickstory for a 99% modeling quality backtest. 25% is pretty much worthless.

    Leave a comment:


  • IA4Forex
    replied
    Originally posted by Amadorian View Post
    Modelling quality - 25% ... Real results won't even be close to the backtest results
    That's a limitation of MT4 on M1 bar: https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/1513
    Here it is the backtest in mt5 with "Real Tick data", that is base on real tick, not the same mt4 tick modeling.
    So, real spred, real tick on news and so on...
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Amadorian
    replied
    Modelling quality - 25% ... Real results won't even be close to the backtest results

    Leave a comment:


  • IA4Forex
    replied
    Sure:

    input bool LongActive=true; Enable Long Baskets
    input bool ShortActive=true; Enable Short Baskets
    input int LongMagic=1; Magic number for long positions
    input int ShortMagic=2; Magic number for short positions
    input string Commento="AI4Forex"; Trade Comment
    input int DynamicStepFactor=100; Calculated Step between levels of the grid is diveded per this value
    input int DynamicDeviationFactor=3; The standard deviation is moltiplied per this value
    input int DynamicProfitFactor=1; The profic factor is moltiplied for this value
    input double BaseLot=0.01; The base Lot
    input int LotEvery=50000; a base lot is opened every "Lotevery". So if you inter 50.000 and balance is 500.000, the base lot wil be 500.000/50.000=0.10
    input double LotFactor=1.1; The tot factor in the martingale
    input int LotDecimal=2; The decimal used in lot calculation


    if you get base lot =0 maybe the balance is too low

    Leave a comment:


  • IA4Forex
    replied
    Originally posted by RenkoGuy

    Very nice !
    I added the MT5 version to the first post.

    Leave a comment:


  • IA4Forex
    replied
    Originally posted by RenkoGuy

    Can you make a version for MT 5 ?
    Yes, sure. I'll attach here as soon as I will have coded it.

    Leave a comment:


  • IA4Forex
    replied
    This Expert uses Artificial Intelligence to make a simple "Moving Average" expert advisor into a winning long term system.
    This is the chart tested from 2000 to 2018. It open a trade at open price and close it at the close of the same bar. That's why I used "Control points" method.
    EURUSD H4
    AI4Forex Moving Average.gif
    Backtest is very slow because if the machine learning that is launched every bar.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X